Tenvo vs RustDesk: The same open-source remote access, fully managed
Tenvo is built on the same AGPL-3.0 remote access core as RustDesk. We add a hosted relay (no port forwarding, no NAT setup), signed installers, real customer support, polished mobile and web clients, and team billing — so you don't have to run your own server to get reliable connections.
Both free. One requires a server room.
Three reasons teams pick Tenvo over self-hosting RustDesk.
We share the same open-source foundation. The difference is what we wrap around it.
Hosted relay, no port forwarding
Tenvo runs a global relay network so connections work behind any NAT or firewall out of the box. With RustDesk you either rent a VPS, configure ports, and maintain it — or accept that direct connections fail on most home and office networks.
Notarized macOS, signing-in-progress Windows
Tenvo ships Apple-notarized macOS builds and a maintained desktop client. Windows EV signing is on the roadmap (current installer still triggers SmartScreen — we won't pretend otherwise). RustDesk's official builds are unsigned on most platforms, which triggers SmartScreen warnings and Gatekeeper friction every time a non-technical user installs.
Real support, no DevOps
Email support on every paid plan and a hosted relay so you don't run your own server. Organization dashboard, seat-based billing, and audit-log UI are roadmapped, not yet shipped. RustDesk is community-supported only — great for hobbyists, painful when production breaks at 2 a.m.
Honest feature-by-feature comparison.
Both products share the same open-source remote access core. Here's where they diverge.
| Feature | Tenvo | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free, $2.99/mo Lite, $7.99/mo Pro | Free (self-host) |
| Hosted relay (no port forward) | Included on every plan | You run the relay server |
| Signed / notarized installers | macOS notarized · Windows EV pending | Unsigned on most platforms |
| Customer support | Email support, paid plans | Community / GitHub only |
| Open source | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| End-to-end encryption | TLS, P2P direct | AES-256, P2P direct |
| Cross-platform | Win, macOS, Linux (Android/iOS in dev) | Win, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, web |
| Self-hostable | Yes (server image available) | Yes (primary distribution model) |
| Organization billing and seats | Roadmapped — not yet shipped | Not available |
When Tenvo wins, when RustDesk wins.
We're honest about the trade-off — RustDesk is the right choice in some scenarios, and we want you to pick Tenvo only when it actually fits.
Pick Tenvo when you don't want to run a server
If your team needs reliable remote access connections without renting a VPS, configuring NAT, monitoring uptime, or rotating TLS certs, Tenvo's hosted relay is the difference between "it just works" and "why won't it connect from the office."
Pick RustDesk when you have DevOps capacity
If you're a developer or sysadmin who already runs servers, wants zero vendor dependency, and prefers to own every byte of the stack, the upstream RustDesk distribution is excellent — and free forever. We respect that path entirely.
Common ground: open-source, encrypted, no telemetry
Both products share the AGPL-3.0 core, TLS-encrypted connections, direct P2P, and a no-telemetry default. Whichever you pick, you get an open-source client you can audit.
Recommendation
Use Tenvo Free for solo and small-team remote access work — same engine, hosted relay, no setup. Self-host RustDesk if you have a homelab or strict data-residency requirements that rule out any third-party relay.
Skip the server room, keep the open source.
Tenvo Free uses the same open-source remote access core as RustDesk, with a hosted relay and signed installers. Free forever for personal use.