screenconnect alternative: ConnectWise pricing and migration

You're staring at a renewal notice from ConnectWise Control (ScreenConnect) and the list price looks like a landed surprise. You need a practical alternative: one with predictable per-device math, a real managed relay option, and a migration path that doesn't leave a fleet of unattended endpoints inaccessible during cutover. This article decodes how ConnectWise-style billing usually works, shows straightforward cost scenarios, and lays out a step-by-step migration plan that won’t strand users or break support windows.

How ConnectWise-style pricing usually gets billed (plain language)

Vendors in this space mix three billing axes and the combination is where list price becomes confusing:

• Per-technician seats (concurrent or named): charged to people who initiate sessions.
• Per-host / unattended device fees: charged for endpoints that must be accessed without someone present.
• Cloud vs self-host: cloud subscriptions include hosting and sometimes basic support; self-host requires an upfront license/server fee plus ongoing maintenance.

ConnectWise Control historically sells multiple tiers (Access/Support/Manage) and lets customers choose cloud hosting or self-hosting. That means a simple-sounding renewal can hide:

• Per-technician increases when you add managers or shift to concurrent-user licensing.
• Per-host charges multiply if you inventory every server, kiosk, or lab machine.
• Hosting and maintenance (SSL certs, backups, HA) are extra for on-prem installs.

If you want to compare vendors by real cost rather than sticker shock, you must map your environment: how many technicians, how many unattended devices, how many active support sessions per month, and whether you need audit/session recording or SSO integrations.

Cost scenarios: translate seats & hosts into annual dollars (examples)

Rather than quoting a vendor page, here are worked examples you can plug your numbers into. Replace the variables with your actual counts to get a comparable estimate. These examples use Tenvo's public pricing where applicable (Free $0, Lite $2.99/mo, Pro $7.99/mo) and show how pay-per-device math changes the outcome.

Example inputs (replace with your counts):
- Technicians: T = 5
- Unattended hosts: H = 300
- Concurrent sessions peak: C = 10

Scenario A: ConnectWise-style cloud (example structure)
- Per-technician seat (cloud): $35 / tech / month
- Per-unattended host: $1.00 / host / month
- Annual cost = (T * 35 + H * 1) * 12
- For T=5, H=300 -> (5*35 + 300*1) * 12 = (175 + 300) * 12 = 475 * 12 = $5,700 / year

Scenario B: Tenvo managed relay (practical comparison)
- Assume you put all endpoints on Tenvo Pro agents: $7.99 / device / month (Pro plan per-device pricing model)
- But Tenvo also supports seat-like tiers — for small fleets, Lite at $2.99 may be enough for non-admin users
- Annual cost = H * 7.99 * 12
- For H=300 -> 300 * 7.99 * 12 = 300 * 95.88 = $28,764 / year

Why the difference? Tenvo's per-device Pro pricing here is an example of a device-centric commercial model. Many vendors mix technician seats and host counts; map your real usage to the math above.

Notes:
- These are example calculations to illustrate how different billing axes change total cost.
- If your organization relies on a small number of technicians and a large device fleet, hybrid pricing (low tech seat + per-host) can be cheaper than flat per-device plans.
- Always check multi-year discounts, MSP bundles, and marketplace reseller pricing.

The exact numbers above are examples to illustrate the math. Do the same arithmetic with your actual quotes and don't forget ancillary costs: backup/HA for self-host, certificate renewal, on-call engineering to patch a self-hosted server, and migration labor.

A migration path that won't strand your fleet (step-by-step)

The technical problem most teams worry about: the current agent receives instructions from ConnectWise's controllers; if you uninstall or cut the controller before your new tool can reach a device, that endpoint becomes unreachable until you get a person on site. The solution is parallel-run and staged cutover. Follow this checklist.

1. Inwentaryzuj i sklasyfikuj urządzenia. Eksportuj listę urządzeń ConnectWise i oznacz, które są bezobsługowe (serwery, kioski), które są używane okazjonalnie (laptopy), a które obsługiwane przez osoby. Potrzebujesz liczby urządzeń w każdej klasie.
2. Zidentyfikuj krawędzie dostępu. Zanotuj urządzenia za NAT, w sieciach z zaporami lub w oddziałach. Będą one polegać na przekaźnikach, chyba że otworzysz porty lub zainstalujesz lokalny przekaźnik.
3. Wybierz metodę wdrożenia równoległego. Użyj dystrybucji oprogramowania (MSI/PKG), push RMM lub etapowego monitu dla użytkownika. Dla Windows zbuduj MSI z odpowiednimi przełącznikami instalacji i podpisz go przed masowym wdrożeniem.
4. Zainstaluj nowego agenta równolegle (nie usuwaj starego agenta). Skonfiguruj nowego agenta, aby rejestrował się w zarządzanym przekaźniku Tenvo (obsługiwanym przez nas; serwery w Niemczech). Jeśli potrzebujesz hostować własny przekaźnik, rozważ samodzielne hostowanie RustDesk zamiast tego. Pozostaw agentów ConnectWise do czasu zakończenia przeniesienia.
5. Grupa pilotażowa. Przenieś 10–20 reprezentatywnych urządzeń bezobsługowych do nowego narzędzia i wykonaj zadania w realnym środowisku (kopiowanie plików, zdalna instalacja, Wake-on-LAN, nagrywanie sesji, SSO). Zweryfikuj logi audytu i mapowanie uprawnień.
6. Przeszkol techników i zsynchronizuj tożsamość. Zintegruj SSO/AD, jeśli to konieczne, i przeszkól techników z procedur sesji. Zmapuj role użytkowników tak, aby uprawnienia odpowiadały staremu systemowi.
7. Stopniowa zmiana dla urządzeń bezobsługowych. Migruj urządzenia bezobsługowe partiami (według lokalizacji, podsieci lub jednostki biznesowej). Po każdej partii pozostaw stary agent zainstalowany, ale wyłącz zdalne sesje z starego kontrolera dla tej grupy—to zapobiega nowym sesjom przy zachowaniu możliwości wycofania.
8. Przenieś techników na końcu. Dopiero gdy wszystkie urządzenia bezobsługowe będą osiągalne na nowej platformie, migruj stanowiska techników i cofaj stare konta. Zachowaj krótkie okno nakładania się, w którym oba serwisy są dozwolone; zaplanuj nakładanie się na 7–14 dni.
9. Plan awaryjny. Zachowaj dostęp do starej konsoli zarządzania i nie usuwaj certyfikatów ani hostingu, dopóki nie zakończysz weryfikacji. Jeśli partia się nie powiedzie, możesz ponownie włączyć sesje starego kontrolera na tych punktach końcowych.
10. Wycofanie. Po 30 dniach pozytywnej weryfikacji odinstaluj stare agenty i zamknij starą warstwę kontrolną.

Key operational details most migrations trip on:

• Licensing alignment: start new subscriptions with flexible start dates so you don't pay double full-year fees for long overlap windows.
• Firewall rules: if the new relay uses different ports or domains, schedule firewall pushes before agent install.
• Wake-on-LAN and remote BIOS/console: test these on pilot machines; some agents require different NIC/WOL handling.
• Session recording & audit: if you have record-retention rules, plan how old recordings are archived and how new ones are stored.

Technical gotchas — what to test before you flip the switch

Run this pre-cutover test battery and document every failure so you don't learn it during a 3 a.m. outage.

• Connectivity modes. Test direct P2P and relay sessions. Remember: when a session routes through a managed relay, TLS terminates at the relay; whoever runs that relay can access session data. That changes threat modeling and compliance obligations.
• Firewall and proxy handling. Verify proxy auth, corporate TLS-inspecting proxies, and allowlists. Some relays need specific SNI or IP ranges whitelisted.
• SSO and MFA. Check role mappings and break-glass accounts for emergency access.
• File transfer and large payloads. Run a large file copy to check throughput and timeouts; record any bandwidth throttling settings.
• Session persistence. Test long-running sessions (2–8 hours) to see if the agent or relay drops idle-but-active sessions.
• Logging and export. Confirm that session logs, operator notes, and exports meet your audit requirements before you decommission the old logs.

For more on connection modes without opening ports yourself, see Remote Desktop Without Port Forwarding Explained. For the security model and what a relay can actually see, read Remote Desktop Security: What You Need to Know.

When to self-host the controller (and why most teams choose managed relay)

Self-hosting is the right choice when you have a written requirement that forces it: a compliance rule forbidding third-party relays, an isolated air-gapped network, or a hard data-residency rule. Self-hosting means you control certificates, storage, and logs — but you also own patching, HA, failover, and key custody. That operational burden has a real staff cost.

Zarządzany relay (zarządzany relay Tenvo jest zalecanym wyborem domyślnym) przenosi hosting i odnawianie certyfikatów na operatora. For many teams, that saves money once you count on-call maintenance, emergency patching, and the engineering time required to run an always-available relay. If you do need self-hosting, document the SLA and put a timed plan to move back to managed hosting if your compliance window ends.

If you plan to self-host, see our guide Self-Hosted Remote Desktop: Why, How, and What Breaks for operational pitfalls. For cost trade-offs over time, check remote desktop cost: 3-year TCO of major tools.

Why Tenvo fits the migration story (honest, practical)

Where Tenvo sits in the decision map:

• Klienci: natywne Windows, macOS, Linux oraz klient w przeglądarce w publicznej becie. To ułatwia równoległe instalacje na systemach desktopowych.
• Managed relay: Tenvo oferuje zarządzany przekaźnik jako domyślny (obsługiwany przez nas; serwery w Niemczech). Jeśli nie możesz użyć przekaźnika stron trzecich i musisz mieć własny hosting, rozważ samodzielne hostowanie RustDesk. Rekomendujemy zarządzany przekaźnik dla większości zespołów, ponieważ zmniejsza koszty operacyjne i eliminuje konieczność awaryjnego patchowania przekaźnika.
• Przejrzystość cen: Tenvo publikuje proste poziomy — Free $0, Lite $2.99/mo, Pro $7.99/mo — dzięki czemu możesz wykonać bezpośrednie obliczenia per‑device i symulować okna nakładania podczas migracji. (Jeśli masz konkretne zniżki MSP lub potrzeby cenowe przy zakupie hurtowym, skontaktuj się ze sprzedażą w sprawie pakietowania.)

Be honest: some rivals win in niche areas. ConnectWise has mature RMM integrations and an ecosystem many MSPs already use; AnyDesk sometimes beats others on latency for low-bandwidth remote control (see AnyDesk Pricing Explained: A Plain-English Decode for 2026). Use those comparisons to validate feature parity, then choose the tool that minimizes total operational cost and migration risk.

Final checklist before you cut over

• Inventory exported and classified (unattended vs attended).
• Parallel agent deployment validated on pilot devices.
• Firewall/update windows scheduled and communicated.
• Break-glass processes tested and documented.
• Technician training and SSO mapped.
• Overlap licensing purchased for the planned overlap period (7–14 days typical).
• Rollback plan and old console access kept for at least 30 days post-cutover.

If your migration plan hits any compliance gates, read Remote Desktop Audit Logging and ensure exported logs meet your retention rules before you retire the old system.

Switching from ConnectWise Control (ScreenConnect) is entirely doable without stranding endpoints — the trick is parallel run, realistic overlap, and verifying the things that actually break in your environment (proxies, WOL, and SSO). Map the math first, stage the cutover, and reserve time for remediation windows.

Ready to try an alternative with a clear pricing model and a managed relay option? Download Tenvo and run a pilot alongside your current system: Download Tenvo. Document the pilot results, then follow the staged migration checklist above to avoid surprises.